
Time turns have not come up again. This is a good thing in my head, but I realize my challenge with it isn’t going to go away without practice. So now I am faced with instrument approaches or navigating to airports by using frequencies and certain rules for landing. I.L.S., Localizer, M.A.P., D.A., G.P.S. I’m guessing for you non aviation people reading this you probably don’t know what any of these are with the exception of the GPS. Here is Wikipedia’s explanation of these terms:
ILS
Localizer
MAP
DA (Decision Altitude)
I have found myself with 4 simulator sessions in a row to learn everything there is to know about instrument approaches. There is a thick book of airports, and all the types of instrument procedures they have that are called approach plates. From my understanding, everyone uses these when flying IFR, from people flying a Cirrus SR20 to your pilot when you fly commercially to see friends or family. So here’s the deal. You have your GPS units, that you program all the radio frequencies required by the approach plates, then you click your direction button to choose the airport you are going to. Then hit the procedure button to choose what you want to do at that airport. Once you select this, it programs your instruments on the glass cockpit (video screen) where to go. You see a little needle pop up on your display telling you which direction is your destination, as well as a line either to the left or to the right of where you are for the most direct path. The trick is trying to line up this line with the arrow as to where you want to go. Which really isn’t too difficult.
After each session on the sim, I felt quite lost. I was walking away from these with a “what the hell did I just do and learn?” feeling. I learned later in the week that I was over thinking the whole thing. That each type of approach I was putting into the GPS was all I really needed to do. It was the interpretation of reading the instruments correctly that was the major component. Which for me was quite simple.
In conjunction with the different types of approaches I am learning holding patterns. These holding patterns are actually specific places that ATC or your IFR charts will tell you to go to hold until you are ready to try your approach again. These will come in the form of what is published on the approach plate if you decide you can’t land safely and go “missed.” ATC will also give you instruction if they do not want you to do the published hold. These will sound something like hold North East of the XYZ VOR on X radial. Since I’m just learning this its important for me to draw these out so I know what I’m doing. This gets a bit complicated as drawing it out help you to identify how you will enter the holding pattern. There is whats called a tear drop entry, a parallel entry and a direct entry. Tear drop is when you pass over your radial line, and turn all the way back around until you are going the right way on your holding pattern. Parallel is flying in on your inbound leg in the opposite direction then turn 180 degrees to recapture your radial and fly the holding pattern. Direct is the easiest as you only have to find the radial and start flying the pattern. Its fun to do but can be a nuisance to try and figure out.
I had three exams this week. Our last ground school stage check, end of course for radio communications, and the end of course for ground school which is the Instrument Gleim test. I spent quite some time studying for all three. The stage check I passed with a 90%, radio passed with 100%. I however did not feel ready at all for the end of course Gleim exam. I called my instructor, and explained. I explained that if I took the exam now I know I wouldn’t pass it, which would go on my school record and I would be grounded until I passed with at least an 80%. You only get three tries at passing this test. He suggested to me that if I didn’t show up for the exam, I would still be grounded, however it would not go on my record, and I would still have 3 tries to pass. Actually he said to consider it an extension of time rather than not showing up. WoW! Sounds good to me! My next step was to talk to my flight instructor to tell him my plan and to see if he would schedule me for ground work to catch me up on the things I felt behind on. All in all if you had a scale and put the pros and cons of this plan on it, I feel like the pros FAR outweigh the cons. If I decide to become a CFI (certified flight instructor) with DCA I think it would be easier to explain why I didn’t show up for a test than to explain why it took me two or three times to pass the exam.
So this coming week, I will have my nose in the Gleim, 8 or more hours a day until I feel ready to take the exam. Once I do and pass, I will take the FAA Instrument exam first, and upon passing that 7 days later will take the FAA Private Exam. Giving me two bars almost at once, once I have enough hours flying. Can’t wait! Bring on the Gleim. Oh… Is there a movie on the Gleim? There is? King videos you say? I’m on it!!
One thing I have been trying to do with this blog is to make it understandable to everyone, not just the aviators out there. If there is anything I talk about that you do not understand, please do not hesitate to contact me or make a comment. And thank you to all for you who have sent me emails supporting my adventure through Flight School! It is very appreciated!